Editorial Essay Example Dissertation Questionnaire Template
Another important factor: figure and table legends must be self-explanatory (Figure 2).
When presenting your tables and figures, appearances count!
If your paper is proposing a new method, you need to include detailed information so a knowledgeable reader can reproduce the experiment. To this end, it's important to use standard systems for numbers and nomenclature.
However, do not repeat the details of established methods; use References and Supporting Materials to indicate the previously published procedures. Reviewers will criticize incomplete or incorrect methods descriptions and may recommend rejection, because this section is critical in the process of reproducing your investigation. For example: Present proper control experiments and statistics used, again to make the experiment of investigation repeatable.
Editor’s note: This 2014 post conveys the advice of a researcher sharing his experience and does not represent Elsevier’s policy.
However, in response to your feedback, we worked with him to update this post so it reflects our practices.
For example, since it was published, we have worked extensively with researchers to raise visibility of non-English language research.
– July 10, 2019Update: In response to your feedback, we have reinstated the original text so you can see how it was revised. Angel Borja draws on his extensive background as an author, reviewer and editor to give advice on preparing the manuscript (author's view), the evaluation process (reviewer's view) and what there is to hate or love in a paper (editor's view). The first article was: "Six things to do before writing your manuscript."[divider]Dr.
In this way, do not attempt to "hide" data in the hope of saving it for a later paper.
Angel Borja is Head of Projects at AZTI-Tecnalia, a research center in the Basque Country in Spain specializing in marine research and food technologies.
Formerly he was also Head of the Department of Oceanography and Head of the Marine Management Area.
This is because it is the most important section of your article. Take into account that a huge numbers of manuscripts are rejected because the Discussion is weak.
You need to make the Discussion corresponding to the Results, but do not reiterate the results.