Apollo Shoes Case Assignment Theatre Studies Essays

Posted by / 12-Dec-2020 23:05

Apollo Shoes Case Assignment

PPGI further stated that "[the] payment arrangement shall in no way cause any amendment of [the] terms and conditions, nor the cancellation of the Contract to Sell [she] executed with PPGI."Liam heeded the notice and forthwith remitted her payments to UCPB.

However, on March 9, 1999, Liam wrote UCPB asking for the deferment of her amortization payments until such time that the unit is ready for delivery. On February 28, 2001, Liam again wrote UCPB complaining of the delayed delivery of the unit and reiterating that she will only resume making payments once the unit is delivered.

On May 29, 1998, PPGI notified Liam of the sale of its receivables to UCPB.

PPGI directed her to remit any remaining balance of the condominium unit's purchase price to UCPB.

PPGI thereafter partially settled its loan by transferring to UCPB its right to collect all receivables from condominium buyers, including Liam.

For this purpose, PPGI and UCPB executed a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) both dated April 23, 1998.

Lyndon demonstrates low distinctiveness because his uncooperative behaviour is typical and he has dismissed assigned work in the past.

Additionally, Lyndon’s poor performance reviews over the past three years and his reluctance to complete previous s.o’s shows high consistency among his actions.

This in turn, influences her management decisions; instead of using her authority to demand the required output from Lyndon, she makes special allowances for him in hopes that he will realize the potential she originally perceives him to possess.To justify her plea, Liam averred that UCPB has already devaluated the market values of the condominium units from the original purchase price of P43,089.00 per sq m to P24,984.15 per sq m.Liam also claimed that she is not liable for the realty taxes on her unit because she is neither in possession thereof nor the holder of its title.Lastly, his actions can be interpreted as possessing low consensus because his resistant behaviour differs from that of his co-workers who have been assigned similar tasks.Jane’s initial distorted perception of Lyndon negatively affected her decision-making process and the quality of her management style. Biases and Errors in Jane’s Decision Making Jane fails to accept that Lyndon’s behaviour is internally caused as a result of her anchor bias and overconfidence bias.

Apollo Shoes Case Assignment-30Apollo Shoes Case Assignment-78Apollo Shoes Case Assignment-75

112195 holding that United Coconut Planters Bank (UCPB) was wrongly impleaded in Florita Liam's (Liam) complaint for specific performance before the Housing and Land Use Regulatory Board (HLURB). The parties also stipulated that the unit will be delivered not later than 35 months from the start of actual construction.